Paramount Insurance v. Rosedale Gardens, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
In this action testing the validity of a disclaimer of coverage based on late notice of claim, Paramount Insurance Company, which insured defendant Rosedale Gardens, Inc. under a general liability policy and an umbrella policy for negligence claims arising out of Rosedale’s ownership, operation and control of a residential building at 1810 Bruckner Boulevard in the Bronx, appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment for a declaration in its favor.
It is undisputed that no notice was given to Paramount until the commencement of a lawsuit against…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Argentina v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Haas Tobacco Co. v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Volmar Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Magen v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Steinberg v. Hermitage InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Tower Insurance v. Lin Hsin Long Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- C.C.R. Realty of Dutchess, Inc. v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.