Silbaugh v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, District Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record directed to the legal sufficiency of review of a former servieemem-ber’s claim for disability retirement by the Department of Defense (“DoD”) Physical Disability Board of Review (the “PDBR”). Plaintiff argues that the PDBR decision was arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to law because the PDBR failed to conduct a thorough review and applied erroneous standards or neglected to apply…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Casiano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019