Legal Opinion

Silbaugh v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 7, 2012No. 11-866CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, District Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record directed to the legal sufficiency of review of a former servieemem-ber’s claim for disability retirement by the Department of Defense (“DoD”) Physical Disability Board of Review (the “PDBR”). Plaintiff argues that the PDBR decision was arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to law because the PDBR failed to conduct a thorough review and applied erroneous standards or neglected to apply…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Casiano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API