New York City Transit Authority v. Quill
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
These motions for injunction, argued together, and considered simultaneously, are, for all purposes, deemed consolidated.
Preliminarily, the court was apprised by all parties that in the matter of the New York City Tr. Auth., plaintiff, v. John W. Rowland et al., application was made to the United States District Court (Southern District of New York) for removal to that court. On motion of the plaintiff to remand this cause to the Supreme Court of New York County, State of New York, the said application to remand was in all respects granted in view of the fact that this action was not properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lerner v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- New York Transit Authority v. LoosNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jamur Productions Corp. v. QuillNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority v. QuillNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Weinstein v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1966