Legal Opinion
State v. Kringstad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1984No. Cr. 976PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
The defendant, Rick Kringstad, appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of gross sexual imposition and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We vacate the judgment and remand.
Kringstad and his co-defendant, David Oasheim, were charged with having forcibly compelled the victim to submit to an act of sexual intercourse in violation of § 12.1-20-03(l)(a) of the North Dakota Century Code. The criminal complaint alleged the act took place between 12 o’clock midnight and 12:30 a.m. on July 9, 1983, in Hoople, North Dakota. The defendants were tried together…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Paul Rowton BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- James Quinn v. William S. Haynes, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center Darrell v. McGraw Jr., Attorney General of the State of West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.