Legal Opinion

State v. Barendt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2007No. 20060370PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrea Barendt appeals from a criminal judgment following a bench trial for Misapplication of Entrusted Property, a class B felony. Andrea Barendt argues her conviction should be overturned because the State failed to prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Andrea Barendt further contends that, even if sufficient evidence existed to support her conviction, the conviction was against the weight of the evidence. We hold sufficient evidence existed to support the verdict, and Andrea Barendt’s challenge to the weight of the evidence was not properly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. JelliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Matter of Estate of MehusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. AlvaradoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API