Petersen v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This was an action at law by Clarice Petersen against the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance issued by the latter. A trial was had to a jury, wherein, after introduction of evidence by all parties, the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict and judgment in behalf of defendant. From the judgment of that court overruling her motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.
This policy was a “combined policy,” and by its terms insured J. J. Nichols, as owner of an automobile described *129as a Buick Master 6 roadster, motor number 1492923, six cylinder, to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Fire Insurance v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Bainter v. AppelNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- LaFleur v. PoeschNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Gilbert v. BryantNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mundt v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Moore v. Washington National InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Strong v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Schnell v. United Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Stilen v. CAVALIER INS. CORPORATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.