Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1936No. 29539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This was an action at law by Clarice Petersen against the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance issued by the latter. A trial was had to a jury, wherein, after introduction of evidence by all parties, the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict and judgment in behalf of defendant. From the judgment of that court overruling her motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.

This policy was a “combined policy,” and by its terms insured J. J. Nichols, as owner of an automobile described *129as a Buick Master 6 roadster, motor number 1492923, six cylinder, to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Fire Insurance v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  2. Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Bainter v. AppelNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. LaFleur v. PoeschNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Gilbert v. BryantNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mundt v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Moore v. Washington National InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Strong v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Schnell v. United Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stilen v. CAVALIER INS. CORPORATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API