Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal Exchange
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — C. C. HamiltoN, Judge. Aotion at law, to recover upon policies of insurance. There was a trial to the court without a jury. Judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
1- ianeeuttion': strict compliance. The plaintiff is the owner oj£ an extensive ice plant at Sioux City, Iowa. The Reciprocal Exchange, named as defendant herein, is a voluntary association of insurers, organized under the terms of Chapter 180, Acts of the Thirty-seventh General Assembly of Iowa. On June duth, defendant issued its policy of insurance to the plaintiff on said ice plant and property for the sum of $11,000, for the term of one year from said date. Later, on July 31, 1918, defendant issued to plaintiff another policy of like character upon the same property for $13,000, for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- American Fire Insurance v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Van Valkenburgh v. . Lenox Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- German Union Fire Insurance v. Fred G. Clarke Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Scheel v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Southwest Baptist College, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Alsco Iowa, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Davis v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.