Legal Opinion

Lonergan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1938No. 8218PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for violating section 215 of *643the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338. He appealed. We affirmed the judgment of conviction. 9 Cir., 88 F.2d 591. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, 58 S.Ct. 18, reversed our judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings. 58 S.Ct. 430, 82 L.Ed.-.

We held that 28 of appellant’s assignments of error (numbered 5, 9 to 25, inclusive, and 31 to 40, inclusive) did not conform to our rule 11 and, therefore, should, not be considered. The Supreme Court held that “some,' if not all,”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Salinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  4. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. Lonergan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Eddie Holland, United States of America v. David HelmecyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. David Farrell and Oliver J. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Peter Schmit, United States of America v. Rex Lee SwinfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Grell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Pierce Lonergan v. The United States of America.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API