United States v. Peter Schmit, United States of America v. Rex Lee Swinford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Peter Matthew Schmit and Rex Lee Swinford appeal their convictions of conspiring in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 to possess, manufacture and distribute methamphetamine and other controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
I. The Hearsay Claims
Appellants’ principal contention is that the district court erred in admitting a tape recorded statement and handwritten notes on pages of a desk calendar as “statement[s] by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E).
To satisfy the Rule…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Fred Eubanks, Eugene Martinez, Leroy Jones, Henry D. YanezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Nile SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Dennis Chan Lai, United States of America v. Silas BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Skw Metals & Alloys, Inc. And Charles Zak, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Robert Steven LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.