Legal Opinion

United States v. Eddie Holland, United States of America v. David Helmecy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1989No. 88-1295, 88-1298PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Eddie Holland, Sr. and David Helmecy were convicted by a jury of conspiracy falsely to represent, and falsely representing numbers to be social security account numbers in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(g)(2) (1982); subscription of false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (1982); and conspiracy to obstruct justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1503 (1982). Holland was convicted of a substantive obstruction count under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, but Helmecy was acquitted.

Appellants raise a number of issues on appeal. None have merit, and we therefore…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Ana Sandoval v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API