United States v. Eddie Holland, United States of America v. David Helmecy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Eddie Holland, Sr. and David Helmecy were convicted by a jury of conspiracy falsely to represent, and falsely representing numbers to be social security account numbers in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(g)(2) (1982); subscription of false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (1982); and conspiracy to obstruct justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1503 (1982). Holland was convicted of a substantive obstruction count under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, but Helmecy was acquitted.
Appellants raise a number of issues on appeal. None have merit, and we therefore…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ana Sandoval v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.