Legal Opinion
Robert E. Hull v. Norcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Norman J. Kauffmann, an Individual
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 24, 1985No. 84-8104PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this diversity action, we review the appropriateness of the district court’s permanent injunction prohibiting the enforcement of an arbitration clause in an employment contract. We affirm.
On May 26, 1980, Robert E. Hull (Hull), the appellee, entered into an employment contract with Norcom, Inc. (Norcom), the appellant, a Delaware corporation. On January 5, 1983, following Hull’s termination of employment, he filed a complaint in the district court seeking damages and a declaration that the contract was invalid because of Norcom’s alleged fraud in the inducement to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Diane O'Neil v. Hilton Head HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Kinney v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Matterhorn, Inc. v. Ncr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.