Legal Opinion
Borgia v. Prudential Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 19, 2000No. 14 E.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice.
This appeal requires us to examine the nature and scope of a contractual arbitration provision in a policy of automobile insurance.
On August 14, 1992, an automobile owned and operated by Appellant, Carmen Borgia, Jr. (“Borgia”), was involved in an *436accident with another motor vehicle. Borgia’s damages from the accident exceeded $15,000, the limit of the liability coverage available under the policy issued by State Farm Insurance Company to the driver of the other vehicle. Borgia had insured his automobile through a policy issued by Nationwide Insurance Company, but had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Ross Brothers Construction Co., Inc. v. International Steel Services, Inc. And American Iron Oxide CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Leonard Coviello Mary Coviello, H/w Ann CovielloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Neuhard v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.