Legal Opinion

Musselman v. Kent

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

The complainants are judgment-creditors of Green, one of the defendants, except one of them, who held a mortgage on the' real estate in question. ■ The' action was brought to reach and subject to the payment of their claims, an interest which they allege Green had in a lot in the city of Logansport. Demurrer t® the complaint, which was overruled. Answer by Musselman in nine paragraphs. Demurrers ¡sustained to the second, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and 'ninth. Replies to the third and fourth, by generail denial. Answer by Iianey, and issue thereon. The case -was commenced in the Cass…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Collins v. NaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Rogers v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Pennington v. CliftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Gaines v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Durham v. BischofIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Fall v. HazelriggIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Newsom v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Stone v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API