Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1885No. 12,188PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant, by his complaint, seeks to recover from the county taxes which it is alleged were wrongfully and illegally exacted from him. The complaint was before us in Newsom v. Board, etc., 92 Ind. 229, where it was held to be good. The questions in the present appeal arise on the issues formed upon answers which plead the statute of limitations.

The position of the appellant is that the money exacted from him for taxes was received in trust for him, and that the statute of limitations can not be made available in a suit against trustees to recover trust funds. This position is not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Peyser v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Raymond v. SimonsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Wilson v. BrookshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. MacK v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Parks v. SatterthwaiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API