Legal Opinion

Gaines v. Walker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The suit is against husband and wife. Order of sale, and of execution for the overplus against the defendants.

There was a paragraph of the answer alleging that a certain judgment creditor of the mortgagor, junior’to the mortgage, was not made a party defendant. This paragraph was not replied to. The judgment creditor had only a general lien upon the equity of redemption. Whitehead v. Cummins, 2 Ind. 58. And such creditor is not regarded in the light of a purchaser for a valuable consideration (Story’s Eq. PL, § 807), and is not a necessary party to a foreclosure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strong v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Whitehead v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Durham v. BischofIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Musselman v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Marks v. Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Vansickle v. ErdelmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API