Gaines v. Walker
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.
1Per curiam
Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The suit is against husband and wife. Order of sale, and of execution for the overplus against the defendants.
There was a paragraph of the answer alleging that a certain judgment creditor of the mortgagor, junior’to the mortgage, was not made a party defendant. This paragraph was not replied to. The judgment creditor had only a general lien upon the equity of redemption. Whitehead v. Cummins, 2 Ind. 58. And such creditor is not regarded in the light of a purchaser for a valuable consideration (Story’s Eq. PL, § 807), and is not a necessary party to a foreclosure…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Strong v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Whitehead v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Durham v. BischofIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Musselman v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Marks v. Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Vansickle v. ErdelmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.