Legal Opinion
Bley v. Dessin
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1939No. Civ. 10983; Civ. 10948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
These are motions to dismiss appeals. After the transcripts had been filed in the above-entitled actions counsel entered into a stipulation that the two appeals could be consolidated and heard and determined as one appeal.
The motion in the first case involves the following facts: On December 4, 1934, the plaintiff filed a complaint asking a judgment for moneys claimed to be due by reason of the breach of certain contracts. The summons was served on II. W. Dessin and on W. J. Dessin. Later they appeared and filed demurrers to plaintiff’s complaint. The demurrers were sustained and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Morrissey v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hogan v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Zierath v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Colquhoun v. PackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Lucky Five Mining Co. v. H. & H. Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Rardin Logging Co. v. BullokCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.