Hunt v. Glassell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Chas. Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action brought to recover judgment against the defendant on a promissory note alleged to have been made, executed, and delivered by the defendant on the twenty-fifth day of September, 1907, to the Duquesne Brewing Company, a corporation, for the sum of ten thousand dollars, subsequently delivered as collateral security to the Fidelity Investment Company, and by further transfers, hereinafter set forth, eventually becoming the purported property of this plaintiff.
In this, as in all cases, our first query is not, “Is there error in the record?” but, rather, “Is there prejudicial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Braly v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Folsom v. BartlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Pezzoni v. GreenwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Risley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Aimo v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932