Legal Opinion
Aimo v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1932No. Docket No. 4524PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, Acting P. J.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant upon two checks executed and delivered to the plaintiff by James H. Mitchell, now deceased. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The record shows that on or about the twenty-seventh day of January, 1930, James PI. Mitchell, signing his name as “J. H. Mitchell”, made, executed and delivered to the plaintiff two checks in the words and figures following, to wit:
“Willows, Cal., Jan. 2'7th, 1930.
“Bank of Willows- 90^476
“Pay to. Nino Aimo or order $566.40/100 Five Hundred Sixty six and 40/100 dollars, for 35.40 tons hay at 16.00 per ton.
“J. H.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Gopcevic v. California Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hamberger-Polhemus Co. v. LewinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hunt v. GlassellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943