Legal Opinion

Risley v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1893No. 18013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action upon a promissory note, executed by the defendant Gray to the defendant Stevens.

*41Tlie plaintiff’s title to the note was derived by a purchase thereof after its maturity at a sheriff’s sale under an execution issued upon a judgment against Stevens. The note had been executed by Gray in part-payment for the purchase of an interest in a mine in Fresno County. At the time of the purchase and execution of the note, Stevens represented to Gray that the value of the ore in the mine was enough when worked out to meet the amount of the purchase-price and notes given therefor, and the purchase by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. GlassellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API