Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Pinder

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

On report. Bill in Equity brought by the heirs of Hiram E. Eddy to remove a cloud from title to certain real estate of which it is alleged he died possessed.

Mr. Eddy died intestate on March 1, 1929. After his death a deed executed by him on June 9, 1924, purporting to convey to defendant the property in question, was duly recorded. The bill alleged that the deed was procured by fraud, but no evidence was offered which even tended to substantiate that allegation. The case was tried and argued on the issue of whether or not the deed was void for want of delivery.

The record shows that the deed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Saltzsieder v. . SaltzsiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Kirby v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Fine v. LasaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Progressive Iron Works Realty Corp. v. Eastern Milling Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  2. Janson v. Cozen and O'ConnorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Hill v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  4. Sachelie v. ConnellanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API