Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Menzies Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 12, 1918No. 21,737PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Geary district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The plaintiff sued the Menzies Shoe Company, a Michigan corporation, and garnisheed certain moneys in the hands of a Geary county, Kansas, firm for a sum due him for services. Another corporation, the Menzies Shoe Company, of Wisconsin, was permitted to intervene, and it claimed the money in the hands of the garnishee. Then the plaintiff amended his petition and made the latter company a codefendant. The parties stipulated that the money really belonged to the Wisconsin corporation, but plaintiff claimed that the latter was bound as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Altoona v. Richardson Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Spadra-Clarksville Coal Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Alberger Condenser Co. v. United Water, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Ledbetter v. Sunflower State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Flemming v. Taylor Fuel, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glass v. PfefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Glass v. PfefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Comstock v. Great Lakes Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Avery v. Safeway Cab, Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Mank v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API