Legal Opinion

Flemming v. Taylor Fuel, Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1913No. 18,367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This appeal was taken by the Natural Gas Company from a judgment against it for an injunction.

On November 22, 1904, an ordinance was adopted by Gas, a city of the second class, granting to the Taylor Fuel, Light & Power Company the right for twenty yeai's to furnish natural gas to its inhabitants .and to the use of its streets for that purpose. Among other conditions a rate of fifteen cents per thousand cubic feet of gas was allowed. The Taylor company accepted the terms of the ordinance and established its gas plant and furnished gas to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Altoona v. Richardson Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Godard v. Topeka Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Avery v. Safeway Cab, Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Spadra-Clarksville Coal Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Crozier v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API