Legal Opinion
Ninestar Technology Co. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 8, 2012No. 2009-1549PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from the Order of the United States International Trade Commission assessing a civil penalty against the Ninestar companies for failure to comply with exclusion and cease and desist orders arising from violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. § 1337. We affirm the Commission’s rulings.
Background
In the foundation action under Section 337, the Commission had found unfair trade practices based on infringement of certain United States patents by the importation and sale of ink printer cartridges produced in China by Ninestar Technology Co.,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Davis v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Cottingham v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Scanlon v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.