Legal Opinion
Davis v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2012No. 07-451VPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
Ms. Marilyn Davis seeks review of a decision entered by the special master on March 20, 2012, concerning attorneys’ fees and costs in her vaccine ease. Ms. Davis had presented a petition for compensation alleging that she developed neuromyelitis optica (“NMO”) as a result of an influenza vaccination. The special master denied her claim for compensation, finding that she failed to provide a persuasive theory of how the vaccine could have triggered the onset of her NMO. Petitioner sought review in this court which affirmed the denial of entitlement to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Sabella v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Chuisano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Cottingham v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Scanlon v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.