Legal Opinion
Comaper Corp. v. Antec, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 1, 2010No. 2009-1248, 2009-1249PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Antee, Inc. (“Antee”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. A jury found that Antee had willfully infringed claims 1, 2, 7, 12, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,955,955 (“the '955 patent”), owned by Comaper Corp. (“Coma-per”), and that independent claims 1 and 12 of the patent were not invalid as obvious. However, the jury also found that dependent claims 2, 7, and 13 were obvious.
We uphold the district court’s claim constructions and reject Antec’s contention that a new trial is required because the district…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wyers v. Master Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Function Media, L.L.C v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Commil USA, Llc v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.