Legal Opinion
People v. Mangiagli
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1950No. Civ. A. 2571PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
This is another case like People v. Fowler (1938), 32 Cal.App.2d Supp. 737 [84 P.2d 326], where a licensed chiropractor prosecuted for violations of the provision of the provisions of the Business and Professions Code regarding medical practice (Div. 2, chap. 5) presents his chiropractic license as a sufficient authority for what he has done and a defense to the prosecution. We conclude that the defense is not sufficient here.
The complaint herein contains two counts, charging, in the words of section 2141, Business and Professions Code, hereinafter quoted, violations of that section on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Cooper v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crees v. California State Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brown v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Newhouse v. Board of Osteopathic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State v. GraysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. CantorAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.