Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Milam

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1901No. L.A. No. 742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to have set aside and declared void two deeds executed by plaintiff to defendant, conveying to the latter a certain lot of land, and to quiet plaintiff’s title thereto. Judgment went for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He also attempted to appeal from the judgment, but such attempted appeal was taken too late, and cannot be considered.

The first deed was executed and delivered to respondent on December 28, 1878, and was on that day recorded, and by it the land was conveyed to respondent in fee-simple. The second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Ponce Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
  2. Crescent Feather Co. v. United Upholsterers' Union, Local No. 28California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Union Collection Co. v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Walbridge v. CousinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Beckley v. Gasoline Steamer "Topo."California Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API