Legal Opinion

Walbridge v. Cousins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1905No. Civ. No. 96PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

In this case a notice of intention to move for a new trial was served and filed on May 8, 1903. The statement was settled August 16, 1904, and filed September 14, 1904, and on this last-named date the motion for a new trial ivas submitted to and denied by the court. On January 6, 1905, the notice of appeal from the order was served and filed. There is no appeal from the judgment.

Respondents make the point that this court is without jurisdiction to hear-the appeal; citing subdivision 3, section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This section provides that an appeal may be taken: “3. From an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Republic Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hunter v. MilamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Michaelson v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Turner v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API