Legal Opinion

Bingham v. CTS Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1991No. B048170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Here we hold that the term “point of operation guard” as used in Labor Code 1 section 4558 includes any apparatus or device that keeps a worker’s hands outside the point of operation while operating a power press.

CTS Corporation (CTS) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury rendered a special verdict in favor of respondent, William J. Bingham (Bingham), in a civil suit for damages for injuries arising out of an industrial accident. We affirm.

Facts

Bingham suffered severe, permanent injury to his wrist when it was crushed by the ram of the 175-ton power press brake he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. LiemsakulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Valdez v. J. D. Diffenbaugh Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Ceja v. J. R. Wood, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vedanta Society of Southern California v. California Quartet Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Flowmaster, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Masonite Corp. v. County of Mendocino Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Graham v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Masonite Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API