Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1917No. 4568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Suit by R. 1. Phillips against W. 0. Mitchell and wife for reformation of a deed, consolidated with a suit by defendants against D. M.-Phillips, R. I. Phillips, and others for damages, and heard together by agreement. Judgment for W. O. Mitchell and wife, and D. M. Phillips and others bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

R. I. Phillips instituted suit in the superior court of Logan county, seeking reformation of a certain deed, executed to him by W. O. Mitchell and Helen E. Mitchell, his wife. Mitchell and wife answered by general denial, and filed a cross-petition, alleging fraud in the procurement of said deed, and prayed damages in the sum of $2.1,000 against D. M. Phillips, R. I. Phillips, H. E. Diehl, and Oito Meek. Upon motion of plaintiffs this cross-petition was stricken, after which plaintiff therein filed an action in the superior court of Logan county against all of said defendants, setting forth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Bradley v. BosleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Hart-Parr Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Willis v. Capitol Well Servicing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API