Legal Opinion
Friederick v. County of Redwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 1, 1922No. 22,983PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover a balance claimed to be due under a contract to construct section 1 of County Ditch No. 22 in Redwood county. This section comprised the open portion of the ditch and was 89,700 feet in length. The case was before this court on a prior appeal and is reported in 148 Minn. 181, 181 N. W. 324, 182 N. W. 514, where a statement of the facts will be found. The second trial resulted in a judgment for defendant and plaintiffs appealed.
At the second trial there was little, if any, dispute as to the material facts. The contract was made in March,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Bentley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Roberts v. SinnottMontana Supreme Court · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Lewis v. Anchorage Asphalt Paving Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Fuchs v. Parsons Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.