Legal Opinion

State v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1933No. 28520PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action against the surety on a guaranty bond, to recover damages caused by the principal’s alleged breach of a construction contract. Defendant had judgment, and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff let to W. H. Pearce & Company a contract to' construct a high pressure steam pipe line, extending from the state’s heating and power plant, located on the University campus in Lincoln, to the state capítol, for the purpose of furnishing heat to the capítol building. The state employed two firms of engineers, one located in Lincoln and the other in Kansas City, the latter known as consulting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Bentley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  5. Enyart v. EnyartNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Salvatore J. Corso v. Creighton University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Greater Richmond Civic Recreation, Inc. v. A. H. Ewing's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API