Emmons v. D. A. Schulte., Inc.

The Chancellor.

Complainant bases his claim for relief upon the following contentions, viz.:

First, that the erection of the signs constitutes an alteration of the building of such character as to depreciate its value, and is, therefore, in violation of the covenant of the lease relating to alterations and additions.

Second, if not an alteration, the signs are an addition to the building, and the same not having been consented to by the complainant the covenant of the lease is therefore violated.

Third, the use of the Ninth street wall for general advertisement purposes constitutes waste, and is…