Legal Opinion
Mastrianni v. Apothecaries Hall Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The trucks of plaintiff and defendant came into collision at about the base of the public highway over Southington Mountain causing substantial damage to plaintiff’s truck. None of the corrections of the finding if made could change the result reached. The conclusion of the court from the subordinate facts that the defendant’s driver was guilty of the negligence charged and that the plaintiff’s driver was- free from contributory negligence must be sustained.
The remaining assignment of error is that the plaintiff failed to prove damages for loss of use of its truck. This' is not accurate. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Emmons v. D. A. Schulte., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- New England Iron Work's Co. v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansen v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Card v. BissingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschaapij, N. V. v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, N. V. v. United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979