Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Day

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellants sued the appellees upon an*, account for goods, etc., sold and delivered to them as partners. Judgment was rendered by default against Howe.

Day answered as follows: “ That he admits that he and' the defendant Howe were formerly partners in the-blacksmith and wagon business; that while so engaged^ they became indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of' :-dollars. But defendant says, that on or about the 6th day of February, 1869, they dissolved said partnership, and ceased thereafter to transact business together; that pending said dissolution, by an arrangement with plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Maddox v. Graham & KnoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Ritenour v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Halstead v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Kerstetter v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Smith v. BettgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API