Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Suit by Kaufman, the appellant, against Noland $ Philips, and Wilson, the appellee. Noland ft Philips were duly served with process, but made default, and judgment was rendered against them. The suit was on a promissory note for $175. Wilson appeared and filed an answer, alleging that he was only the surety of Noland ft Philips on said note, and that on the 25th of May, 1867, he sent to the plaintiff a notice by telegraph, which the latter *505received on the same day, as follows, viz: “ S. Kaufman, No. 219 East Washington street, Indianapolis, Indiana; Express Noland ^ Co.’s note to Esquire…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fensler v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Jones v. Balsley & RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Franklin v. FranklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Barnes v. MowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Edmonson & Reekes v. Potts' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API