Legal Opinion
State v. Doughty
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 5, 2009No. 26573-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
201 P.3d 342 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Walter Moses DOUGHTY, Appellant.
No. 26573-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
February 5, 2009.
Janet G. Gemberling, Gemberling & Dooris PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Mark Erik Lindsey, Spokane County Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
¶ 1 The defendant here appeals the trial court's refusal to suppress drug evidence seized after he visited a drug house at 3:20 a.m. for a two-minute-long visit. We conclude that the circumstances provided ample grounds for a Terry[1] stop and affirm the trial judge's…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DoughtyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DoughtyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011