Legal Opinion

State v. Doughty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2010No. 82852-1PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 Late one night petitioner Walter Moses Doughty approached a suspected drug house, stayed for two *60minutes, then drove away. A police officer who observed Doughty’s approach and departure stopped Doughty on suspicion of drug activity. During this investigative seizure the officer ran a records check and, based on the results, arrested Doughty for driving with a suspended license. Police found methamphetamine during a vehicle search incident to arrest. Doughty argues the investigative seizure was unlawful. We agree, and we reverse the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

¶2 At 3:20 a.m. on August 14,2007,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. FuentesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API