Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 31, 2011No. AC 30282PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Jeremy Kelly, appeals from the judgment of conviction following his conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 to possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (a). The defendant’s plea followed the trial court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to suppress evidence as the fruit of an illegal seizure of his person. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the seizure was constitutionally permissible and (2) allocated the burden of proof to the defendant. We affirm the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. McCormackConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014