CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Funderburg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
While the court states as a fact that feme defendant received no consideration binding her on the contract of indemnity, and for that reason is not liable, the question for determination is not a factual question, but one of law, viz: Do the undisputed facts establish a consideration imposing liability on feme defendant?
W. S. Funderburg, on April 27, 1960, contracted with the United States for the construction of a dike near Charleston. At the request of W. S. Funderburg, plaintiff (Continental) executed a bond guaranteeing performance of the contract and payment of labor and material used in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Storm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brown v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martin v. VanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- In Re Claim of DuckettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Collie v. Wehr Dissolution Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Deal v. ChristenburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.