Legal Opinion

Deal v. Christenbury

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1981No. 8026SC494PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants assign error to the trial court’s (1) denying defendant-wife’s motion to dismiss the action as to her, made on the ground that there was no evidence of any consideration for her execution of the note and deed of trust; (2) failing to “explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case” as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51, by not instructing the jury on defendant-wife’s defense of lack of consideration; (3) failing to submit all the issues arising on the evidence as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 49, in that it failed to submit as an issue the defense of lack of consideration as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Meyers v. . AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. FunderburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Bank v. Barclay Riding Academy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Dockery v. Estate of Jack C. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API