Deal v. Christenbury
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants assign error to the trial court’s (1) denying defendant-wife’s motion to dismiss the action as to her, made on the ground that there was no evidence of any consideration for her execution of the note and deed of trust; (2) failing to “explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case” as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 51, by not instructing the jury on defendant-wife’s defense of lack of consideration; (3) failing to submit all the issues arising on the evidence as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 49, in that it failed to submit as an issue the defense of lack of consideration as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Meyers v. . AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. FunderburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Bank v. Barclay Riding Academy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Dockery v. Estate of Jack C. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997