Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1982No. Appeal, No. 388 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board properly applied the law concerning an employer’s right to subrogate a claimant’s workmen’s compensation benefits when those benefits are awarded after the employer’s payment of full salary pursuant to Section 1 of the Act of June 28,1935, (Heart and Lung Act), P.L. 477, as amended, 53 P.S. §637. For the reasons which follow, we reverse the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board).

Wilbur P. Tyson (Claimant), a police officer for the City of Chester (Employer),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Steinle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. American Chain & Cable Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. McIntosh v. Borough of Pleasant HillsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Organ v. Pa. State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. City of Philadelphia v. J. Hargraves, IIICommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API