Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Borough of Pleasant Hills

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1797 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Following an injury that occurred during the course of his employment as a police officer, Rodney A. McIntosh (claimant) has continued to receive, during his recuperation, his salary from the Borough of Pleasant Hills (Borough). The Borough, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 of the Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477, as amended (Heart and Lung Act), 53 P.S. §637, has been receiving claimant’s workmen’s compensation benefits from the Northwestern National Insurance Group (Insurer). On October 19, 1974, Insurer tendered its last payment to the Borough. Then, on October…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Mifflin-Juniata State Health FoundationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GuzmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Inter-State Tile & Mantel Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Anderson v. Independent Pier Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Mushroom Transportation Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Republic Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. K-Mart Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Bowden v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Tyson v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Forschner v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API