Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1987No. 8717SC33PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The disposition of plaintiffs’ appeal on their cause of action for the wrongful death of their stillborn child is controlled by the decision of our Supreme Court in DiDonato v. Wortman, 320 N.C. 423, 358 S.E. 2d 489 (1987). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the trial court as to that claim.

Defendant contends that the cause of action for the wrongful death of the fetus should still be dismissed as it was not brought by the personal representative of the deceased as required by G.S. 28A-18-2(a). See Young v. Marshburn, 10 N.C. App. 729, 180 S.E. 2d 43, cert. denied, 278 N.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Nicholson v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Vance v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. District of Columbia v. McNeillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Coughlin v. George Washington University Health Plan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Singleton v. RanzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Gallagher v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API