Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1938No. Civ. 6084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against her for broker’s commissions for procuring a purchaser of real property deemed to be ready, willing and able to buy the land upon the terms of a written contract therefor.

It is claimed the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence for the reason that there is a fatal variance between the vendor’s contract to sell and the written offer to buy the real property.

The defendant owned the “Fountain Ranch” in Mendocino County, consisting of 2,862 acres of farm land, subject to a mortgage of $21,000 held by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Colton v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hersh v. GarauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dixon v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Sproul v. Parks Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Scarbrough v. HopeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API