Sproul v. Parks Et Ux.

McDonough, Justice.

Plaintiff sued to recover a real estate broker’s commission. Defendants answered denying that plaintiffs procured a buyer who was either willing or able to purchase on the terms specified in the listing contract. Defendants also counter-claimed for damages, alleging that plaintiffs maliciously clouded title to the property by filing of record an unauthorized mortgage. From a judgment of no cause of action on the amended complaint, and from judgment on the counterclaim, plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs attack the findings and judgment as contrary to the evidence and as contrary…