Legal Opinion

American Bumper and Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1996No. Docket Nos. 101808, 101809, 101817-101822, Calendar No. 6PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

In this appeal we must determine whether and to what extent general liability insurance carriers are required to defend their insured from an Environmental Protection Agency claim in which the investigation ultimately showed no need for remediation and resulted in a “no action” record of decision for the site. Because we find that the Court of Appeals, under the specific circumstances of this case, properly concluded that the insurers may owe a duty to defend, we affirm. Additionally, we hold that certain site investigation costs incurred after and in response to the epa claim may be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Polkow v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Cailu Title Corporation, Donald G. Sare, Jr., and Kelly L. SareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. American InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API