Legal Opinion

Defenbaugh v. Purcell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1942No. 30061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

,PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by George M. Purcell, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Joe S. Anderson, John T. Harris, Kurt Von Sturm, Lloyd Defenbaugh, Paul Brown, and I. D. Berry, to recover on an oral contract of employment and .to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon an oil and gas mining lease. Zero Hour Bomb Company and Independent-Eastern Torpedo Company, by separate petitions, intervened in the action and sought to recover money judgments and to foreclose materialmen’s liens against the same parties and property. There were also a number of other persons involved in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKay v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. National Union Oil & Gas Co. v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Billingsley v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Murray Tool & Supply Co. v. Bridgeport MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Epperson v. Halliburton CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Gilroy v. White Eagle Oil Co. Alberton Corp. v. White Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Jenkins v. PappasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API