Legal Opinion
Billingsley v. Parmenter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 23, 1937No. 27486PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action • involves the foreclosure of laborers’ liens upon an oil and gas mining lease, and particularly the question of the propriety of personal judgment against the owner of an undivided interest therein.
The plaintiff in error, C. L. Billingsley, the owner of an undivided one-third inter est in said lease, commenced the action in the district court of Hughes county against the defendants in error B. A. Holland, B. W. Parmenter, and E. O. Freeman for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the operations on said lease. Holland filed his answer and cross-petition seeking…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Vose v. U.S. Cities CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Gamel v. HyndsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Carson v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Robinson Petroleum Co. v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Arkansas Oil & Mining Co. v. Murray Tool & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Robb v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Conley Drilling Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Defenbaugh v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.