Legal Opinion

South San Joaquin Irrigation District v. Neumiller

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1935No. S. F. 15202PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as Tax Collector of the County of San Joaquin, to give notice of the making of certain agreements between the board of supervisors of said county and the board of directors of South San Joaquin Irrigation District pursuant- to section 3897d of the Political Code, enacted in 1933. (Stats. 1933, p. 2580.)

In pertinent respects the foregoing section provides that whenever any property has been deeded for delinquent taxes or assessments to the state and the same property has also been deeded for delinquent taxes or assessments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HornbeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fox v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Chesney v. GreshamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Sutter-Yuba Investment Co. v. WasteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API